Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. SajjadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners subject to the conditions imposed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioners, Md. Sajjad and Aman Kumar, were arrested after police intercepted their vehicle and recovered 126 litres of foreign liquor, alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. They contended that they were not the owners of the vehicle or the liquor, had no conscious possession, and were falsely implicated, emphasizing their clean antecedent and the length of custody since 10 May 2026. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the nature of the allegation, the petitioners' clean record, and the period of detention. Relying on Section 480(3) of the BNSS and the principles of bail, the court directed that bail be granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to specific conditions. The bail order required the petitioners to appear on all court dates and stipulated cancellation of bail for non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail under Section 480(3) of the BNSS in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent and period of custody justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42883 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Araria
                 ======================================================
           1.     Md. Sajjad Son of Late Md Sahub @ Late Mohammad Sahub Resident of
                  Village - Mathana Milik, Ward No.- 08, P.S.- Garoul, District - Vaishali.
           2.    Aman Kumar Son of Lalu Swarnkar Resident of Village - Gadhbanili, Ward
                 No.- 02, P.S.- Kasba, District - Purnea

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Md Fazle Karim, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in

                   connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 168 of 2026 registered for

                   the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   & Excise Act, 2016.

                                03. As per prosecution case, petitioners were

                   apprehended when their vehicle was intercepted on the basis of

                   secret information of transportation of illicit liquor and from

                   search of their vehicle, recovery of 126 liters of foreign liquor

                   was made.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42883 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

          this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from

          conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel further

          submits that the petitioners are neither the owner nor have any

          concern with the seized vehicle or the seized liquor. The

          petitioners have been implicated in this case due to the high-

          handedness of the police. Learned counsel further submits that

          the petitioners are having clean antecedent and they are in

          custody since 10.05.2026.

                       05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioners.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of allegation and further considering the period of

          custody of the petitioners and their clean antecedent, the

          petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          learned I/c Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-II, Araria/court

          concerned in connection with Araria P.S. Case No. 168 of 2026,

          subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS

          and the following conditions:
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42883 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

                                  the petitioners.

                                  (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each

                                  and every date fixed by the court below.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                                  or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                                  bond of the petitioners will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.