Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a Rs 10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar, was arrested for allegedly transporting 82.8 litres of Nepali liquor in an e‑rickshaw, violating Sections 30(A) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. He claimed he was merely a passenger, not the driver or owner, and that no incriminating material was found on him. The petitioner had a clean antecedent and had been in custody since 27‑04‑2026. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the nature of the allegation, the petitioner’s clean record, and the length of custody. The court ordered his release on bail of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and additional personal surety and attendance requirements.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 30(A) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 given the facts of the case
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of being merely a passenger and having no ownership or control over the seized liquor affects the bail decision

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition
  • excise
  • liquor
  • e‑rickshaw
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 30A
  • Section 41(1)
  • Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act
  • Section 480(3) BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42886 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2026 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Rajesh Kumar S/o Pramod Sahni R/o Village - Bariyarpur Ward No. 43, P.S -
                 Chhatauni, District - East Champaran.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 265 of 2026 registered

                   for the alleged offences under Sections 30(A) and 41(1) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

                                03. As        per     prosecution      case,      petitioner    was

                   apprehended transporting 82.8 liters of country made Nepali

                   liquor in his e-rickshaw.

                                04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

                   case and nothing incriminating has been recovered from his

                   person or possession. The petitioner was merely a passenger

                   who was riding that e-rickshaw and when the driver left to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42886 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          attend the call of nature, the petitioner was apprehended by the

          police party. The petitioner is neither owner nor driver of the

          said e-rickshaw and he has no concern with the seized liquor.

          Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has got clean

          antecedent and is in custody since 27.04.2026.

                       05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioner.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of allegation and further considering the period of

          custody of the petitioner and his clean antecedent, the petitioner

          above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

          Excise Judge-I, East Champaran, Motihar/court concerned in

          connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 265 of 2026, subject to

          the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the

          following conditions:

                       (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of

                       the petitioner.

                       (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                       every date fixed by the court below.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42886 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                                  (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                                  or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail

                                  bond of the petitioner will be liable to be

                                  cancelled by the court concerned.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.