Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Irfan @ IrfanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Irfan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022, with 31 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his physical possession and that his name appeared only in the statements of co‑accused, asserting a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The court noted that the recovery was not made from the petitioner’s possession and, considering his clean record, found no substantive ground to deny bail. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the case

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • clean antecedent
  • recovery not in possession
  • CrPC 438
  • BNSS 482

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42887 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2026 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Irfan @ Irfan, S/o Md. Eqbal, Resident of Mohalla- Kiranighat River
                 Side Road, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya Ji At present- Pamchayati Akhara,
                 Neem Gali, Paschmi Sarai Road, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Gaya
                                                                                ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case

                   No.228 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 31 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   petitioner that the alleged recovery was made from a

                   Motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR02AP-5319. It is further

                   submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious

                   possession of the petitioner. It is also pointed out that the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42887 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                      name of the petitioner surfaced solely on the disclosure

                      statement made by co-accused, namely, Md. Hasnain and Md.

                      Tanbir Alam, who were apprehended from the spot. The

                      petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                                   5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

                      bail to the petitioner.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

                      taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not

                      appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner,

                      accordingly, the petitioner above-named, who is a man of clean

                      antecedent in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court

                      below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to

                      be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge

                      Excise-IV, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No.228

                      of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                      438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                         (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.