Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Murari Kumar Paswan @ Murari PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Murari Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, the sister of an informant, alleged to have been tortured and left unconscious on 31‑08‑2024, leading to her death in hospital. He was charged under sections 80, 123 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and a charge‑sheet was filed under section 108. Paswan contended that he was innocent, that the deceased had committed suicide, and that the informant was not an eye‑witness; he also highlighted his clean antecedents and that he had been in custody since 14‑09‑2025. The State opposed his bail application. Considering the nature of the accusation, the investigation material and the length of custody, the Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Whether the material evidence and length of custody justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • murder
  • suicide
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • charge sheet
  • regular bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4292 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- Sonki District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Murari Kumar Paswan @ Murari Paswan S/O Late Bilayati Paswan @ Vilati
                 Paswan R/O Village and P.O- Sajhuar, P.S- Bahera, Distt.- Darbhanga.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the parties.
                                2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for
                   the offence punishable under sections 80, 123 and 3(5) of the
                   B.N.S.
                                3. As per prosecution case, marriage of sister of
                   informant was solemnized with petitioner Murari Paswan in the
                   year 2021. It is alleged that on 31.08.2024, all the accused
                   persons named in the F.I.R., including this petitioner, after
                   torturing, left the sister of informant in unconscious condition at
                   her paternal house and fled away. Thereafter, informant’s sister
                   was taken to D.M.C.H. for treatment where she was declared
                   dead.
                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
                   behalf of the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, that
                   petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.
                   Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and only
                   suspicion has been raised against the petitioner. As a matter of
                   fact, deceased committed suicide. Deceased died in hospital
                   while she was under treatment. Charge sheet has already been
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4292 of 2026(2) dt.16-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       filed finding the case to be true under section 108 of the
                       Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Petitioner claims clean
                       antecedent and he is in custody since 14.9.2025.
                                    5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer
                       for bail.
                                    6. Considering the nature of accusation, materials
                       collected during investigation and period of custody of the
                       petitioner, his prayer for regular bail is allowed. Let the
                       petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing
                       bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
                       like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial
                       Magistrate I, Darbhanga in Sonki Police Station Case No. 59 of
                       2024.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.