Patna High Court
Binod yadav @ Ramashakar YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner as the recovery did not prima facie establish his personal possession of illicit liquor.
Summary
The petitioner, Binod Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 86.4 litres recovered from a vehicle, but not from his personal possession. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the recovery was based solely on statements of co-accused and that he had no direct possession of the liquor. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the prima facie evidence did not show the petitioner’s physical possession of the illicit liquor. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon surrendering within four weeks, subject to a bail bond and sureties, and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail was granted pending further trial.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC in view of the alleged recovery of illicit liquor.
- Whether the recovery of liquor from a vehicle, without the petitioner's personal possession, suffices to deny bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Non-Statutory (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- prohibition act
- criminal procedure
- bail bond
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42937 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2026 Thana- Bhopatpur District- East Champaran
======================================================
Binod yadav @ Ramashakar Yadav, Son of Satya Narayan Yadav, Resident of
village- Nayaka tola, Ps- Bhopatpur, Dist- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and
apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhopatpur P.S.
Case No.42 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in
illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is
recovery of 86.4 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
petitioner that the alleged recovery was made from a Car
bearing Registration No. DL1CP-3562. It is further submitted
that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession
of the petitioner. It is also pointed out that the name of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42937 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
2/2
petitioner surfaced solely on the disclosure statement made by
co-accused, namely, Rahul Kumar and Chutun Kumar, who
were apprehended from the spot. The petitioner has three
criminal antecedent, in which, he is on bail.
5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory
bail to the petitioner.
6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not
appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner,
accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his
arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four
weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned Special Judge Excise-I, East Champara, Motihari in
connection with Bhopatpur P.S. Case No.42 of 2026, subject
to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
Raushan/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.