Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abdus Subhan @ Abdul Subhan @ Abdul SubhahanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no prima facie evidence of his possession or involvement in the illicit liquor offence.

Summary

The petitioner, Abdus Subhan, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor involving 4.9 litres of codeine syrup, seized from a bike he owned. He contended that the case was filed under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, not the NDPS Act, and that his name appeared only because he was the vehicle's registered owner, with no evidence of his conscious possession or involvement. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the seizure did not prima facie establish the petitioner's possession of the liquor. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged offence is under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and not the NDPS Act
  • Whether the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle is sufficient to establish possession and liability for the seized illicit liquor
  • Whether the seizure list, lacking independent witness testimony, can support a charge against the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • NDPS Act
  • bail bond
  • codeine syrup

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42940 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
                 Abdus Subhan @ Abdul Subhan @ Abdul Subhahan Son Of Abdul Hakim
                 R/o Dangibari Ward no 7, Thana- Thakurganj, District- Kishanganj

                                                                                        ... ... Petitioner
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-07-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Madya Nisedh

                   P.S. Case No.465 of 2026 arising out of Special Case No.

                   471 of 2026 registered under Sections 30(a), 30(f), 34(b)

                   and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 4.900 litres of Codeine Syrup.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42940 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                            2/3




          a Bike bearing Registration No. BR37Q-0570. It is initially

          submitted that the present case was instituted under the

          provisions of the Excise Act and not under the NDPS Act. It

          is further submitted that the petitioner’s name has been

          surfaced in the present case solely on the ground that he is

          the registered owner of the seized vehicle, and not on the

          basis     of     any     material       demonstrating   his   conscious

          possession, involvement or complicity in the alleged offence.

          It is further submitted that seizure list also appears doubtful

          being not supported by independent witnesses rather than by

          police personnel. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent,

          in which, he is on bail.

                         5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                         6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42940 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II,

                      Kishanganj in connection with Madya Nisedh P.S. Case

                      No.465 of 2026 arising out of Special Case No. 471 of

                      2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                      438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.