Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sandip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and the conditions specified by the Court.

Summary

The petitioner, Sandip Kumar, was arrested after police recovered 120 litres of illicit mahua liquor from a motorcycle he was alleged to be riding. He claimed innocence, stating that the liquor and motorcycle were not in his conscious possession and that he is a student with a clean record. The State opposed bail, invoking the seriousness of the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. The Court considered the nature of the recovery, the length of custody since 4 May 2026, and the petitioner’s personal circumstances. Applying the principles of bail under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S., the Court directed that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions. The order also required the petitioner to appear before the trial court as directed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in a case of alleged transportation of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of conscious possession and clean antecedents justify bail
  • Application of Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. in granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • Section 30
  • Section 480
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43031 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2026 Thana- BARHARA District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sandip Kumar S/o Raj Narayan Rai, Resident of Village- Shaligram Singh Ke
                 Tola, P.S.- Barahara, District- Bhojpur.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Makardhwaj Upadhyay, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Barahara P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026 dated

                   03.05.2026, registered for the offences punishable under Section

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,

                   2018.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, Police received

                   secret information about transportation of illicit liquor on

                   motorcycle. On seeing the Police party one person tried to run

                   away leaving behind motorcycle on which two bags were

                   loaded. The said miscreant was arrested after a chase and he is

                   the present petitioner. On search of the bags kept on the

                   motorcycle, recovery of 120 litres of country made mahua

                   liquor was made.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43031 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




                          4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

          been implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating has

          been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

          The petitioner has no concern either with the seized motorcycle

          or with the allegedly recovered liquor. Petitioner is a young

          student preparing for competitive examinations having clean

          antecedent. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner is in

          custody since 04.05.2026.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

          opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of recovery and period of custody of the petitioner, the

          petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

          Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I,

          Bhojpur, Ara / concerned Court, in connection with Barahara

          P.S. Case No. 95 of 2026, subject to the condition laid down

          under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following

          conditions:
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43031 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                      3/3




                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

                    trial Court.

                                    (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                    or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                    petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.



                                                                 (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.