Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the recovery of illicit liquor did not prima facie demonstrate the petitioner's conscious possession and the search was procedurally defective, warranting the grant of anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was arrested under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amended) Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 25 litres seized from his residence. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious and exclusive possession and that the search violated Section 103(4) of the BNSS because no independent witness was present. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The court observed that the seizure did not prima facie establish possession by the petitioner and noted procedural deficiencies in the search. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Does the seizure of illicit liquor establish the petitioner's conscious and exclusive possession under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act?
  • Was the search and seizure conducted in compliance with Section 103(4) of the BNSS requiring an independent witness?
  • Should anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNSS?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • illegal liquor
  • anticipatory bail
  • search and seizure
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition Act
  • CrPC
  • BNSS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43056 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Deepak Kumar, S/o Chitnarayan Prasad Yadav @ Chitranjan Yadav, Resident
                 of Village- Belanawad @ Bela Nauwad, P.S.- Bealdaur, District- Khagaria

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-07-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case

                   No.63 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amended) Act.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 25 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered from

                   the house of the petitioner. It is further submitted that no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43056 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                            2/3




          recovery has been effected from the conscious and exclusive

          possession of the petitioner, and there is no material on

          record to establish his conscious possession of the alleged

          illicit liquor. It is argued that Section 103(4) of BNSS has

          not been complied with qua search of premises, inasmuch as

          no independent witness was associated with the search and

          seizure list and the seizure witnesses were police personnel

          themselves. It is also pointed out that the name of the

          petitioner surfaced due to previous enmity. The petitioner

          has one criminal antecedent of similar nature, in which, he is

          on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not

          appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43056 of 2026(2) dt.06-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise-II, Begusarai

                      in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No.63 of 2026, subject

                      to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.