Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Masum @ Masum RazaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond with conditions.

Summary

Masum Raza was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged possession of 1,341 litres of illicit Nepali liquor recovered from seized motorcycles. The petitioner contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, no contraband was found on his person, and he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the lack of direct recovery, the petitioner’s clean record, and his custody duration since 12 May 2026. Considering these factors, the court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other stipulated terms. The bail was granted with conditions regarding surety, attendance before the trial court, and cancellation on non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 given the facts of non‑apprehension at the spot and lack of recovery from him
  • Whether the provisions of Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. are applicable to the bail order

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition and excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • clean antecedent
  • Section 480(3)
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43058 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2025 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Masum @ Masum Raza Son of Mohabub Alam, Resident of Village-
                 Mahajan, P.S.- Bajpatti, District- Sitamarhi.
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                               ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner        :       Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the State             :       Ms. Asha Kumari, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-07-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                      2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Parihar P.S. Case No. 357 of 2025 dated

                   09.12.2025, registered for the offence punishable under Section

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act 2022.

                                      3. As per the prosecution case, during the course of

                   patrolling duty, a number of motorcycle riders were found

                   carrying jute bags on their motorcycles and when they saw the

                   Police, they tried to run away from the place, however chase

                   was given and one person, namely Somji along with his

                   motorcycle was apprehended. The other co-accused persons fled

                   away leaving behind their motorcycles and from the four

                   motorcycles left behind by the miscreants, recovery of 1341

                   litres of country made Nepali liquor was made. Petitioner is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43058 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                            2/3




          stated to be the miscreant who fled away from the spot.

                          4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

          been implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating has

          been recovered from his person or possession. The petitioner

          was not apprehended from the spot as is clear from the FIR.

          Petitioner has no concern with the motorcycle seized for the

          contraband recovered from the said motorcycles. Learned

          counsel next submits that petitioner is having clean antecedent

          and chargesheet has been submitted. Learned counsel lastly

          submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2026.

                          5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

          opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          fact that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and no

          recovery has been shown from the petitioner and also

          considering his clean antecedent and his period of custody, the

          petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, on

          furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

          Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Exclusive Excise Court-
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43058 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                      3/3




                    01, Sitamarhi / concerned Court, in connection with Parihar

                    P.S. Case No. 357 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down

                    under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following

                    conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned

                    trial Court.

                                    (iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates

                    or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                    petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.



                                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.