Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bisheshwar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Bisheshwar Sharma, owner‑driver of a tempo, was arrested in connection with a case of illicit ganja recovered from two passengers. He was charged under Sections 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 8(c), 20(B)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner claimed innocence, a clean antecedent, and argued that a driver is not required to inquire about the goods carried by passengers. The State opposed bail. Considering the recovery of the narcotics from the passengers, the petitioner's clean record and the length of custody, the Court allowed the bail application, directing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposing attendance and cooperation conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the owner‑driver of a tempo can be held liable for possession of illicit ganja recovered from passengers
  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the offences and the circumstances of custody

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • drug offence
  • possession
  • driver liability
  • criminal procedure
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43250 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- RATANPUR District- Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Bisheshwar Sharma S/o Late Madhu Sharma R/o Village - Dumri, Ward No.
                 2, P.S - Karjain, District - Supaul

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Nawaz Shareef
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State. A supplementary affidavit has been

                   filed and the same is taken on record.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   under Section(s) 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

                   2023 and Section 8(c), 20(B)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the Indian

                   Penal Code.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 38

                   Kg of illicit ganja from Bishundeo Chaudhary and Binod Sah,

                   who was travelling in the tempo.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. The

                   petitioner is in custody since 22.02.2026 and claims a clean
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43250 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                            2/3




          antecedent. He further submits that the petitioner is the owner-

          cum-driver of the tempo in question and is not involved in the

          crime. He also submits that the owner-cum-driver is not

          required to inquire about the goods being carried by the

          passengers.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the fact that the alleged ganja was

          recovered from the aforesaid two persons, the petitioner being

          the driver-cum-owner of the tempo, the clean antecedents of the

          petitioner and the period of custody, this application for bail is

          allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

          pending/successor Court in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case

          No. 20 of 2026 subject to conditions that:-

                                              (i). The petitioner will mark his
                                  attendance at the Karjain Police Station on
                                  the first Sunday of each month. Any default
                                  in appearance at the Police Station would
                                  result in cancellation of bail bond of the
                                  petitioner.
                                               (ii) The petitioner shall appear in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43250 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                                              the trial regularly either personally or
                                              through his lawyer and shall cooperate in
                                              the trial and non-cooperation in the trial
                                              shall result in cancellation of the bail bond
                                              of the petitioner.
                                   8. The grant of bail to the petitioner shall not be

                      claimed as a matter of parity by the aforesaid two accused

                      persons for the grant of bail.

                                   9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                 (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.