Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to bail bond, sureties and a maintenance payment condition.

Summary

Santosh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a complaint (Case No. 119C of 2023) alleging his involvement in assault, torture, and dowry harassment under IPC sections 323, 341, 504, 498A and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner claimed innocence and feared arrest. The informant opposed the bail. Relying on the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a Rs.10,000 bail bond with two sureties and to comply with Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482 of the Code. The court also imposed a condition that the petitioner pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000 to the informant, starting January 2026. The order was pronounced by Justice Sandeep Kumar.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the complaint.
  • Whether the guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar are applicable to this case.
  • What conditions, if any, may be imposed while granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • IPC offences
  • maintenance order
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Arnesh Kumar guidelines

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43389 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2023 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - BIRPUR District-
                                                         Supaul
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Sharma Son of Shri Bechan Sharma Village and
                 Po- Parsa, ward no 05, PS -kishanpur, District -supaul

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar bihar
           2.    Rekha Kumari Wife of Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Sharma Village and Po-
                 Parsa, ward no 05, PS -kishanpur, District -supaul Present Daughter of Baua
                 sharma, village- Ratanpur, Ward no. 7, Ps- Ratanpura, Dist- Supaul

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Amrit Abhijat
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   21-01-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

                                   2.         The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Complaint Case No. 119C of 2023 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 504, 498A of the Indian

                   Penal Code and under Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

                   others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

                   demand of dowry and the accused persons have also ousted the

                   victim from her matrimonial home.

                                   4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

                   the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43389 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                            2/3




          been implicated in this case.

                          5. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed

          the application of the petitioner.

                          6 . Considering the submission of the parties and in

          view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the

          case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

          SCC 273, this application of grant of anticipatory bail is

          allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

          four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM,

          Birpur, Supaul/concerned Court below in connection with

          Complaint Case No. 119C of 2023, subject to the conditions laid

          down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

          1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

                          8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner is

          directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 10,000/- from the

          month of January, 2026 to the informant and the maintenance

          for the month of January, 2026 shall be paid to the informant

          before 31.01.2026 and thereafter the maintenance amount shall
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43389 of 2025(5) dt.21-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                    be paid to the informant every month before the 10 th day of the

                    month.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.