Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shailendra Rai @ Shalendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Since the liquor was not recovered from the petitioner's conscious possession, the court granted bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Shailendra Rai, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 624 litres recovered from an open field. Counsel argued that the liquor was not in the petitioner's conscious physical possession and that his name was supplied by a local chowkidar. The State opposed the bail application, citing the petitioner’s involvement in other criminal cases. The High Court observed that the recovery did not prima facie establish possession by the petitioner and therefore ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail order was directed to be complied with by the Special Excise Judge, Saran.

Issues considered

  • Whether the recovery of illicit liquor establishes conscious physical possession by the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial.
  • Whether the FIR naming the petitioner based on a chowkidar’s disclosure suffices for arrest.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43421 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2026 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Shailendra Rai @ Shalendra Kumar Son of Sheojee Rai R/o Village - Lauwa,
                 P.S.- Isuapur, Distt.- Saran at Chapra.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Rabindra Kumar Tiwary
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   03-07-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is named in FIR and apprehending

                   their arrest in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 128 of

                   2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section

                   30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be

                   engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where,

                   there is recovery of 624 litres of liquid spirit from the place of

                   occurrence.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submitted that recovery of illicit liquor is made from

                   the open field like bamboo bush (banswari), which is accessible

                   by general public, where nothing recovered from the conscious

                   physical possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted

                   that the name of petitioner surfaced on the basis of disclosure

                   made by local chowkidar. It is also pointed out that recovery of

                   illicit liquor was not made from physical possession of this
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43421 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petitioner. While explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted

                      that petitioner found involved in three more criminal cases,

                      where he is on bail.

                                   5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                                   6. In view of aforesaid factual submission as

                      recovery of illicit liquor prima-facie not appears to be made

                      from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner,

                      accordingly, both above named petitioners, in the event of

                      their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a

                      period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on

                      bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                      Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to

                      the satisfaction of the learned 3rd Exclusive Special Excise

                      Judge, Saran at Chapra/concerned Court, where the case is

                      pending in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 128 of 2026,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                      the BNSS.



                                                                 (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.