Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhisek Kumar singh alias abhisek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted as the recovery of illicit liquor was not shown to be in the petitioner’s conscious possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhisek Kumar Singh, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 137.85 litres recovered. He contended that the liquor was seized from a co‑accused’s poultry farm and that he had no physical possession or direct involvement, arguing that the seizure list lacked independent witnesses. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petition for anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not appear to be from the petitioner’s conscious possession. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC and Section 482 of the BNSS despite the FIR alleging possession of illicit liquor
  • Whether the recovery of liquor can be said to be in the petitioner’s conscious possession

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • BNSS
  • excise law
  • CrPC

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43442 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2026 Thana- KATHAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Abhisek Kumar singh alias abhisek Kumar Son of Arun Kumar singh @ Arun
                 Kumar R/O Vill.- Sirsiya Jagdish, P.S- Kathaiya, Dist.- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Priyesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Kathaiya P.S.

                   Case No.128 of 2026 registered under Sections 274 and

                   275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short ‘B.N.S.’, 2023)

                   and Sections 30(a), 32(2), 36, 41(1) of Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act, 2022.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 137.85 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43442 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

          made from the poultary farm of co-accused, namely, Roshan

          singh. It is also submitted that name of petitioner arrayed

          solely on the disclosure made by the other co-accused. It is

          further said that petitioner is neither connected with alleged

          liquor nor the petitioner was apprehended on the spot and it

          can be safely said that the recovery of illicit liquor was not

          made from conscious possession of this petitioner. It is also

          submitted that the seizure list also appears doubtful being

          not supported by independent witnesses rather than by

          police personnel. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is

          submitted that the petitioner found involved in one criminal

          case, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43442 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

                      on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                      Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise- II,

                      Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kathaiya P.S. Case No.128

                      of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                      Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the

                      BNSS.


                                                     (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.