Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Kumar @ MandalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, in the absence of evidence that the seized liquor was in the petitioner's possession, anticipatory bail was warranted.

Summary

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar @ Mandal, was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 300.375 litres seized near the River Ganga. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the liquor was recovered in a public place, he was not present at the seizure, and there was no evidence of his conscious possession; the allegation was based merely on local suspicion. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail, citing the petitioner’s involvement in two other criminal cases. The court observed that the recovery of liquor did not appear to be from the petitioner’s physical possession and therefore granted anticipatory bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order directs the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and comply with the bail conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the seized illicit liquor is not in the petitioner's physical possession.
  • Whether mere suspicion and information from local residents suffice to name a person as an accused.
  • Whether the petitioner's prior criminal antecedents preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43453 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2026 Thana- Rangara District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Rohit Kumar @ Mandal S/o Bindeshwari Mandal Resident of village- Gyani
                 das tola, P.S- Rangara, District- Bhagalpur

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :          Mr. Anamika Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :          Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Rangra P.S. Case

                   No.48 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 300.375 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                   made near river Ganga which is an open place accessible to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43453 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                            2/3




          general public. It is also submitted that name of petitioner

          arrayed solely on the basis of suspicion as the disclosure has

          been made by the local people. It is further submitted and

          petitioner was not present at the place where alleged liquor

          was seized and also not connected in any manner with the

          said seized liquor. It can be said that recovery of illicit liquor

          was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner.

          Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the

          petitioner found involved in two more criminal cases, where

          he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43453 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise, Bhagalpur,

                      in connection with Rangra P.S. Case No.48 of 2026, subject

                      to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                          (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.