Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vickey Kumar @ Vicky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Vickey Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 291 litres seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a plot owned by another person, that he had no ownership or possession of the liquor, and that the charges were based merely on suspicion. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The court examined the factual submissions and noted the lack of direct possession by the petitioner and his clean antecedent. Consequently, the court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order was pronounced by Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the alleged involvement in illegal liquor trade under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of ownership and possession of the seized liquor negates the necessity of custodial detention.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • Section 30
  • bail bond
  • CrPC

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43457 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2026 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District-
                                                       Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Vickey Kumar @ Vicky Kumar S/O- Santosh Sah R/O village - Ekbhinda,
                 Ward no 1,P.S - Sadar, District - Darbhanga

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :       Mr. Nawal Kishor Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :       Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   03-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case

                   No.114 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 291 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                   made from the bushes which was the plot of Jahir Ahmad. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43457 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                            2/3




          is also submitted that name of this petitioner arrayed solely

          on the basis of suspicion. It is further argued that petitioner

          is not the owner of the said plot and also the petitioner is not

          in any way connected with the seized liquor. It is also

          submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from

          conscious possession of this petitioner. It is also submitted

          that the seizure list also appears doubtful being not

          supported by independent witnesses rather than by police

          personnel. Petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, who is a man of clean antecedent, accordingly,

          the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43457 of 2026(2) dt.03-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      learned Special Judge- I, (Excise Act), Darbhanga, in

                      connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.114 of 2026, subject to

                      the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

                      CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                         (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.