Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jugesh Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to all petitioners subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties and conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the BNS, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners, accused in Dinara Police Station Case No. 364 of 2025 for offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 121(2), 324(5), 132 and 109 of the BNS, 2023, sought bail. The prosecution alleged that a mob of about 200 persons attacked the police station, damaged property and assaulted an informant, causing injuries. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, that the injuries described were inconsistent with a mob attack, and that the case stemmed from a land‑dispute feud. The State opposed bail, asserting the petitioners were part of the mob. Considering the nature of the allegations, the framing of charges, and the period of custody, the court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposed conditions under Section 480(3) of the BNS and additional safeguards.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused persons charged under Sections 191, 190, 121, 324, 132 and 109 of the BNS, 2023 in view of the alleged mob attack on a police station.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 324(5)

Subjects

  • bail
  • mob assault
  • police station
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar
  • Sections 191
  • Sections 121
  • Sections 324
  • Sections 132
  • Sections 109

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3341 of 2026
           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas
     ======================================================
     Shivji Paswan, Son of Late Bikau Paswan, Resident of Village- Belwaiya,
     P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
     The State of Bihar

                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
                                            with
                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3483 of 2026
           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas
     ======================================================
1.    Dharmendra Ram, Son of Sukhari Ram
2.   Sukhari Ram @ Sukhadi Ram, Son of Late Ramadhar Ram
3.   Jay Ram Ram, Son of Bhuar Ram
4.   Mahabir Ram, Son of Late Bachchu Ram
5.   Pashuram Ram, Son of Sukhari Ram @ Sukhadi Ram
6.   Rama Kant Ram, Son of Late Deo Munni Ram
7.   Ajeet Kumar @ Ajit Kumar, Son of Late Bharosa Ram
     All are residents of village - Panchauli, P.O. - Bhaluni Dham, P.S. - Dinara,
     District - Rohtas.

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
     The State of Bihar

                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
                                            with
                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4374 of 2026
           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2025 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas
     ======================================================
     Jugesh Kumar Ram, Son of Late Jay Bhagwan Ram, Resident of Village -
     Balwaiyan, Police Station - Dinara, District - Rohtas.

                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                           Versus
     The State of Bihar

                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3341 of 2026)
         Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3341 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                     2/5




                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3483 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4374 of 2026)
                 For the Petitioner/s     : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uday Chand Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                    Since all these bail petitions arise out of Dinara P.S.

                   Case No. 364 of 2025, as such, they have been taken up together

                   and are being disposed of by this common order.

                                2. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                3. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in

                   connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025, registered

                   for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1),

                   121(2), 324(5), 132 and 109 of the BNS, 2023.

                                4. As per prosecution case, a mob of 200 persons

                   assembled near Dinara police station and started shouting

                   slogans against the police. Thereafter, they attacked the police

                   station and started damaging articles kept there. They also

                   assaulted the informant, who was only official present in the

                   police station. The informant received injuries in the hands of

                   the attackers.

                                5. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners

                   that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3341 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            3/5




          this case. The allegation against the petitioners and other co-

          accused persons is that a mob of 200 people assaulted the

          informant with lathi, danda. However, injuries received by the

          informant are lacerated wound 1”x1/2”x1/2” over left eye,

          swelling 2” x 2” on frontal region of head, bruise 4” x 3” on left

          elbow. Patient was referred for CT Scan as well as X-ray, but the

          reports have not been annexed and perhaps injuries are all

          simple in nature. It has further been submitted that if 200

          persons attacked the informant, only the injuries mentioned in

          the FIR would not have caused, rather the informant might have

          suffered serious injuries. It has further been submitted that the

          true fact of the case is that Dinara P.S. Case No. 363/2025 was

          registered on the same day as over land dispute, two groups in

          the village of the petitioners indulged in fighting and the police

          came in collusion with the other side and lodged this false case

          against the petitioners. It has also been submitted that the

          petitioner of Cr. Misc. No.3341 of 2026 is in custody since

          09.09.2025 and is having antecedent of two cases. The

          petitioners of Cr. Misc. No. 3483 of 2026 are in custody since

          16.10.2025 and are having clean antecedent. The petitioner of

          Cr. Misc. No.4374 of 2026 is in custody since 19.08.2025 and is

          having antecedent of two cases. The charges have been framed.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3341 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            4/5




                       6. Learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the submission

          made on behalf of the petitioners. The learned APP submits that

          the petitioners were part of the mob which attacked the police

          official in the police station.

                       7. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and

          submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          nature of allegation and framing of charge against the petitioners

          and further considering their period of custody, the petitioners

          are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional

          Sessions Judge-1, Bikramganj, Rohtas/concerned court, in

          connection with Sessions Trial No. 453 of 2025, arising out of

          Dinara P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025, subject to the conditions

          mentioned in Section 480 (3) of BNSS and also the following

          conditions :

                                  (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                  relative of the petitioners.

                                  (ii) The petitioners will remain present on

                                  each and every date fixed by the below, if

                                  so required by the learned trial court.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on three
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3341 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       5/5




                                             consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                             terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                             petitioners will be liable to be cancelled

                                             by the court concerned.



                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.