Patna High Court
Vikash Kumar @ Vikas KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court granted bail to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 249, 109, 61(2), 351(2) of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have fired at a victim. He had been in custody since 28 November 2025 and applied for bail, claiming innocence and that no bullet injury was caused. The State opposed the bail application. The Court examined the material and, finding no compelling reason to deny bail, allowed the petition. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount. The order was pronounced by Justice Sandeep Kumar.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the pending criminal case under the cited sections.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27
- Bihar Penal Code — s. 109, 126(2), 249, 351(2), 61(2)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- Bihar Penal Code
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43808 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2025 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur
======================================================
Vikash Kumar @ Vikas Kumar S/o Santosh Kumar Mahto @ Santosh Mahto
R/o Village- Batha, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Rosera, P.O.- Udaypur, District-
Samastipur, Bihar, India.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar
Mr.Prem Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar No. 3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Rosera P.S. Case No. 120 of 2025 registered for the offence
under Sections 126(2), 249, 109, 61(2), 351(2) of the BNS and
under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
said to have fired upon the victim when he was going to Rosera.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2025.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
case no bullet injury has been caused to the alleged victim.
6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43808 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
2/2
application of the petitioner.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this application
is allowed.
8. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned concerned Court below in connection with Rosera
P.S. Case No. 120 of 2025.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.