Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh BhoktaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to cooperation with the trial.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Bhokta, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Case No. 6 of 2025) alleging that he and Akhilesh Singh Bhokta fired upon the deceased. The FIR was lodged on 26‑04‑2025 for an incident that occurred on 23‑04‑2025, and the post‑mortem report indicated a single gun‑shot injury. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the deceased had a dispute with Akhilesh Singh Bhokta and that the petitioner was falsely implicated, having been in custody since 13‑03‑2026. The court examined the limited forensic evidence and the claim of false implication and found no compelling reason to deny bail. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the condition that the petitioner cooperate with the trial proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the offences under the BNS and the Arms Act
  • Whether the petitioner was falsely implicated in the murder

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure
  • pre‑trial detention

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43848 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKARANDHA P.S. District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Singh Bhokta Son of Shyamdeo Singh Bhokta @
                 Ramdeo Singh Bhokta R/o Village- Baratand, Tola- Majhiyama, P.S.-
                 Chakarbandha, District- Gaya Ji.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Jitendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                                Mr. Venkatesh Kaushik
                                                Mr.Varun Krishna Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr.Anita Kumari
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-07-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                    2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Chakrabandha P.S. Case No. 6 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the BNS and under Section

                   27 of the Arms Act.

                                    3. As per the prosecution case, the deceased was

                   having some dispute with one Akhilesh Singh Bhokta and

                   Akhilesh Singh Bhokta and the petitioner, who is the brother-in-

                   law of the brother of the Akhilesh Singh Bhokta, are said to

                   have fired upon the deceased.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43848 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                            2/3




                          4. The petitioner is in custody since 13.03.2026.

                          5. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits

          that the occurrence has taken place on 23.04.2025 but the FIR

          has been filed on 26.04.2025 and from the post-mortem report,

          it appears that there is only one gun shot injury sustained by the

          deceased.

                          6. Considering the aforesaid facts, it appears that

          Akhilesh Singh Bhokta has all the reasons for killing the

          deceased and the petitioner may have falsely been implicated in

          this case.

                          7. Accordingly, this application is allowed and the

          petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned

          Court below in connection with Chakarbandha P.S. Case No. 06

          of 2025.

                          8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner, after

          being released on bail, is directed to co-operate in the trial either

          by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court

          on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Non-compliance

          of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of

          the petitioner.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43848 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                                      3/3




                                  9. It is made clear that this order will not entitle

                    Akhilesh Singh Bhokta to claim parity with the present

                    petitioner.



                                                            (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.