Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pramod Ram @ Pramod Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court held that regular bail could not be granted due to the seriousness of the offences and the death of the victim.

Summary

The petitioner, Pramod Ram @ Pramod Kumar Rai, was arrested in connection with a case where he and co‑accused allegedly intercepted, assaulted and stabbed an informant, resulting in the victim's death. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and prolonged custody since 7 April 2026. The prosecution opposed, emphasizing the grave nature of the offences and the victim's demise. The court examined the seriousness of the charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the fact that the victim died while receiving treatment. Concluding that the offences were of a serious and grave nature, the court declined to grant regular bail and dismissed the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to an accused charged with offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 where the victim has died.
  • Whether the seriousness and gravity of the alleged offences justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • serious offences
  • murder
  • assault
  • death of victim
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail denial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43896 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2026 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Pramod Ram @ Pramod Kumar Rai S/o Uma Rai R/o Village- Dhankhar, P.S-
                 Manjhagarh, Dist- Gopalganj.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Dharmveer
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shantanu Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 141 of 2026 registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1),

                   109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, along

                   with the other co-accused persons, is alleged to have intercepted

                   and assaulted the informant, causing injuries to him. It is further

                   alleged that during the occurrence, co-accused Ranjan Kumar

                   stabbed the victim while co-accused Mantu Kumar took away

                   his mobile phone. The victim subsequently succumbed to his

                   injuries during treatment.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43896 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                        2/2




                                   4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                      submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

                      implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the

                      petitioner is in custody since 07.04.2026 and deserves the

                      privilege of regular bail.

                                   5. Per contra, learned APP for the State vehemently

                      opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the allegations

                      levelled against the petitioner are serious and grave in nature.

                                   6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

                      the case, the nature and gravity of the offence and the fact that

                      the victim subsequently died during treatment, this Court is not

                      inclined to grant the privilege of regular bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made

                      hereinabove is prima facie in nature and has been made solely

                      for the purpose of adjudication of the present bail application.

                      The same shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on

                      the merits of the case and shall not, in any manner, influence the

                      trial or any other proceeding arising out of the present case.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.