Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Om Prakash RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that, in accordance with the principles laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Om Prakash Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 1030 of 2015) alleging offences under IPC Section 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and filed an application for anticipatory bail. The court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482. Additionally, the petitioner was ordered to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.7,000 to the informant.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC 498A and the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry harassment
  • IPC 498A
  • Dowry Prohibition Act
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • maintenance order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44004 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1030 Year-2015 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                          Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Om Prakash Ram S/o- Ramdeni Ram Village- Ushiyan Ps- Dildarnagar Dist-
                 Gazipur, U.P
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Rita Devi W/o- Om Prakash Ram, D/o- Late Nandlal Ram Village- Odi Ps-
                  Itarhi Dist- Buxar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sunil Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-01-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

                                   2.         The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                   connection with Complaint Case No. 1030(c) of 2015 registered

                   for the offence under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code

                   and under Section 4 of the D.P. Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and

                   others are accused of assaulting and torturing the victim for

                   demand of dowry.

                                   4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for

                   the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

                   been implicated in this case.

                                   5. Learned counsel for the informant has opposed

                   the application of the petitioner.

                                   6 . Considering the submission of the parties and in

                   view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44004 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                    case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar reported in (2014) 8

                    SCC 273, this application of grant of anticipatory bail is

                    allowed.

                                    7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

                    his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

                    four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

                    bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

                    like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-

                    Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar/concerned Court below in

                    connection with Complaint Case No. 1030(c) of 2015, subject to

                    the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of

                    Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

                                    8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner is

                    directed to pay a maintenance amount of Rs. 7,000/- from the

                    month of January, 2026 to the informant and the maintenance

                    for the month of January, 2026 shall be paid to the informant

                    before 31.01.2026 and thereafter the maintenance amount shall

                    be paid to the informant every month before the 10 th day of the

                    month.


                                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.