Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to conditions prescribed under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjay Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly transporting 25.180 litres of foreign liquor on a red scooter. The scooter was intercepted; one individual was apprehended and identified the petitioner, who had fled the scene and was not seized in possession of the liquor. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, had no recovered contraband from his conscious possession, and was already on bail in four other cases. The State argued that the petitioner was a habitual offender with similar prior offences. The Court, noting the lack of direct possession, the fact that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot, and the filing of the charge sheet, granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. The order also required the petitioner’s presence on all court dates and stipulated cancellation of bail for non‑compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act given the circumstances of the case.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal history and similarity of past offences affect the grant of bail.
  • Whether the provisions of Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. are applicable to impose bail conditions.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • habitual offender
  • Section 480(3)
  • excise offence
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44103 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-800 Year-2025 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN District-
                                                       Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Sanjay Sah @ Sanjay Kumar Sah Son of Shivnath Sah @ Dhural Sah
                 Resident of Village- Mathiya, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, District- Gopalganj

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                      Versus

                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Naresh Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in

                   connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No. 800 of 2025

                   registered for the alleged offences under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                03. As per prosecution case, information was received

                   about two persons transporting liquor on a red colour scooty.

                   The said scooty was intercepted and two persons started running

                   away on seeing the police party, one person was apprehended.

                   The apprehended person disclosed the name of the petitioner,

                   who fled away from the spot. On search of the scooty, 25.180
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44103 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                            2/3




          litres of India made foreign liquor was made.

                       04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner and he was not

          apprehended from the spot. The petitioner has no concern with

          the seized liquor or the scooty from which recovery has been

          made. The petitioner is having antecedent of four cases and he is

          on bail in all the cases. The petitioner is in custody since

          18.04.2026 and charge sheet has been submitted.

                       05. Learned APP opposes the submission made on

          behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the

          petitioner is a habitual offender and two of the cases are of

          similar nature.

                       06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          fact that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and

          no recovery has been shown from his conscious possession and

          further considering the period of custody of the petitioner and

          submission of charge sheet, the petitioner above named is

          directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44103 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions

                      Judge-XIII          -cum-         Special            Judge,   Excise   -I,

                      Gopalganj/concerned Court in connection with Gopalganj Town

                      P.S. Case No. 800 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned

                      in Section 480(3) of B.N.S.S. and also the following conditions :

                                                      (i) One of the bailors will be a close

                                                      relative of the petitioner.

                                                      (ii) The petitioner will remain present

                                                      on each and every date fixed by the

                                                      court below.

                                                      (iii) In case of absence on three

                                                      consecutive dates or in violation of the

                                                      terms of the bail, the bail bond of the

                                                      petitioner will be liable to be cancelled

                                                      by the court concerned.



                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

    DKS/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.