Patna High Court
SADANAND RAMversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SOURENDRA PANDEY
Holding
The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Sadanand Ram, filed an application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.4418 of 2024 before the Patna High Court. He sought the court's permission to withdraw the application while retaining the liberty to raise any future points that may arise in the case. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this withdrawal. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with the petitioner retaining the liberty to raise further points in the future. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal matter were addressed in this order.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw an application pending before the High Court while preserving the right to raise future points?
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- high court procedure
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4418 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3232 Year-2014 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria
======================================================
Sadanand Ram, S/O Late Muneshwar Ram, R/O Village- Jalalgarh, East Of
Nh Over Bridge, P.S- Jalalganj, Distt.- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Md. Tafezul, S/O Md. Nuhu, R/O Village- Sandalpur At P.S And Distt.-
Araria.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 27-01-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present application with the liberty
to challenge the subsequent developments which could have
taken place in the present case and raise all the points which are
available to him.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn with
the aforesaid liberty.
(Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-
U T
Checking your session…