Patna High Court
VIJAY BINDversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The court held that bail could not be granted and dismissed the application.
Summary
Vijay Bind applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 109, 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he fired at the victim's chest. The prosecution produced an injury report corroborating the allegation. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Kumar Vikram, argued for release on bail. The court examined the seriousness of the offences and the supporting medical evidence. Considering the nature of the allegations, the bench was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in view of the alleged firing on the victim and the seriousness of the offences under the BNS and Arms Act.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- serious offence
- injury report
- court discretion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44607 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2026 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
VIJAY BIND S/O BANSHU BIND R/o vill - Goraipur, P.S.- Bhabua, Distt.-
Kaimur (Bhabua)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Vikram
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 08-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 190 of 2026 registered for the offence
under Sections 109, 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and
under Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to
have fired upon the chest of the victim.
4. The petitioner is in custody 22.04.2026 and in the
allegations are supported by the injury report also.
5. Considering the nature of allegation, this Court is
not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.