Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hira Mahto @ Hiralal MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner with specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Hira Mahto, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly selling 25 litres of illicit liquor. He has been in custody since 18 May 2026 and claims he is innocent, offering to donate Rs. 25,000 to a charitable organization without admitting guilt. The State opposed his application for regular bail. The High Court, after considering the custody period, the petitioner’s claim of a clean antecedent, and the submissions of counsel, allowed the bail application. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, conditioned on the donation, monthly attendance at the police station, and verification of his clean antecedent.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting regular bail to a person accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act?
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and willingness to make a charitable donation justify bail despite the seriousness of the offence?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • clean antecedent
  • charitable donation
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44658 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2026 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Hira Mahto @ Hiralal Mahto S/o Late Jangi Mahto R/o Village - Asahani
                 Tole, Vanshi Chapra, PS - Rasulpur, District - Saran, Bihar

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Rishika Arya, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Adya, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Arif Daula Siddiquie
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-07-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The present application has been filed seeking

                   regular bail in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 153 of

                   2026, registered for offences punishable under Section 30(a) of

                   the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along

                   with others is accused of selling illicit liquor. Upon search, 25

                   liters of illicit liquor have been recovered from spot. The

                   petitioner is in custody since 18.05.2026 and claims clean

                   antecedent.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44658 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence; rather,

          he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further

          submitted that the petitioner undertakes to donate a sum of Rs.

          25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) to a charitable

          organization, without prejudice to his defence and without

          admitting guilt.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

          the case, the period of custody, and the submissions advanced

          on behalf of the parties, the application for bail is allowed.

                       7. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case

          No. 153 of 2026, subject to the following conditions:

                                       (I). The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.
                          25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand only) with
                          Ramakrishna Mission Ashrama, Latu Maharaj Path,
                          opposite Circuit House, Chapra, Bihar, and shall
                          produce a valid receipt thereof before the court below.
                          The bail bonds shall be accepted only after verification
                          of the genuineness of the said receipt.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44658 of 2026(2) dt.09-07-2026
                                                           3/3




                                                   (ii).     The   petitioner   shall   mark   his
                                      attendance at Rasulpur Police Station on every 1st
                                      Sunday of each month. In the event of default, the bail
                                      bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

                                                   iii) At the time of accepting the bail bonds of
                                      the petitioner, the court below shall verify whether the
                                      petitioner has a clean antecedent. The bail bonds shall
                                      be accepted only if it is found that the petitioner has a
                                      clean antecedent. However, it is made clear that the
                                      acceptance of the bail bonds shall not be delayed on
                                      the ground of, or in the name of, such verification.
                                      During the process of verification, the petitioner shall
                                      be released on interim bail and upon completion of
                                      the verification, the court below shall pass an
                                      appropriate order in accordance with law.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                           (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.