Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Dilsad Alam @ Md. Dilshad AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petition for bail is allowed, subject to bond and surety conditions, under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Dilsad Alam, sought bail fearing arrest in a theft case (Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 334(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act. He claimed innocence, alleging false implication due to personal enmity and noted that no stolen property had been recovered from him. The State opposed the bail application. The court considered the lack of prior criminal antecedents, the absence of recovered stolen goods, and the petitioner’s failure to earlier seek anticipatory or regular bail. Applying Section 482(2) of the Bihar Non‑Securable Substances (B.N.S.S.) Act, 2023, the court granted bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within eight weeks with a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions regarding concealment of antecedents or false statements.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the theft case under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged lack of criminal antecedents and absence of recovered stolen property justify bail

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 482
  • Bihar law
  • theft
  • anticipatory bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4471 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Dilsad Alam @ Md. Dilshad Ahmad S/O Md. Maksud Ansari, R/O
                 Village- Shakurabad, P.S.- Shakurabad, Dist.- Jehanabad

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr. Anish Chandra, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, dated

                   03.02.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 334(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of BNS.

                                 3. As per allegation, there is theft of some paddy from

                   the cowshed of the informant.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case on account of enmity. He further submits that there is no

                   recovery of any theft property from the possession of the

                   petitioner.

                                 5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4471 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                            2/3




          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-named,

          to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the

          date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his

          furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection

          with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025, subject to the

          conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.,

          2023 and on the following conditions:

                       (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

          below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

          court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

          hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

          concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4471 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     same.

                                  (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                     below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                     learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                 (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.