Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Komal DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted as the recovery of illicit liquor did not prima facie establish the petitioner's possession.

Summary

Komal Devi was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor after 189 litres were recovered from a pickup van she owned. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession as the vehicle was driven by a hired driver and the seizure list lacked independent witnesses. The State opposed her application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not prima facie show her possession of the liquor. Consequently, the court directed that she be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the alleged contraband is not shown to be in the accused's conscious possession
  • Whether the lack of independent witnesses to the seizure list affects the grant of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • seizure
  • bail bond
  • excise law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44797 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2026 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Komal Devi W/o Vikash Kumar R/o vill - Gandhi Ashram, P.S.- Hajiput
                 Town, Distt.- Vaishali, Bihar

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending her arrest in connection with Hajipur Town

                   P.S. Case No.311 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 189 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was

                   made from the Pick-up Van bearing Registration No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44797 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                            2/3




          BR01GN 6717 which was involved in carrying illegal

          consignment of liquor. It is also submitted that the name of

          petitioner arrayed only for the reason that she is the owner

          of the said vehicle. It is further argued that the said pickup

          vehicle was plied by hired driver and it can be safely said

          that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious

          possession of this petitioner. It is also submitted that the

          seizure list also appears doubtful being not supported by

          independent witnesses rather than by police personnel.

          Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the

          petitioner found involved in one criminal case.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44797 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I,

                     cum District and Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at

                     Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No.311

                     of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                     Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the

                     BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.