Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted as the seizure did not establish the petitioner's possession and he has a clean antecedent.

Summary

The petitioner, Sittu Kumar, was named in an FIR for allegedly manufacturing illegal cough syrup, with 15 litres seized under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. Counsel argued that the seized liquor was found on a third party's maize field and that there was no evidence of the petitioner's possession or involvement, noting his clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed anticipatory bail. The court observed that the seizure did not prima facie establish the petitioner's possession and, given his clean record, directed that he be released on bail upon surrendering to the lower court within four weeks, subject to a bail bond and sureties. The bail was granted under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s name in the FIR, based solely on villagers' statements, suffices to establish possession for prosecution.
  • Whether the seizure of illicit liquor from a third party’s field implicates the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • illegal liquor
  • possession
  • clean antecedent
  • CrPC Section 438

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44872 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2026 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Sittu Kumar, Son of Hitlar Yadav, Resident of village- Laxaminiya Tola,
                 Kanp, Ward no. 4, P.S.- sour Bazar, Dist- Saharsa

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Sour Bazar P.S.

                   Case No.82 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended).

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit cough syrup, where there

                   is recovery of 15 litres of Cough Syrup.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that the seized illicit liquor was recovered from

                   Maize field of one, namely, Chandan Kumar. It is initially
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44872 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                            2/3




          submitted that the present case was instituted under the

          provisions of the Excise Act and not under the NDPS Act. It

          is further submitted that the name of the petitioner surfaced

          solely on the disclosure made by villagers, and not on the

          basis     of     any     material       demonstrating   his   conscious

          possession, involvement or complicity in the alleged offence.

          It is further submitted that seizure list also appears doubtful

          being not supported by independent witnesses rather than by

          police personnel. The petitioner claimed clean antecedent.

                         5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                         6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking of note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner above-named, who is a

          man of clean antecedent, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44872 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                        3/3




                      learned Exclusive Special Judge Excise-II, Saharsa in

                      connection with Sour Bazar P.S. Case No.82 of 2026,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

                      of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Raushan/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.