Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Halima KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, finding no prima facie possession of the illicit liquor.

Summary

The petitioner, Halima Khatoon, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with 6.3 litres of liquor recovered from a public nala behind her house. Her counsel argued that the liquor was recovered from an open area, not from her conscious possession, and that the seizure list lacked independent witnesses, rendering the allegation speculative. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed anticipatory bail, citing the petitioner’s involvement in three other criminal cases. The court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not prima facie show possession by the petitioner. Consequently, the court directed that she be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The order was pronounced by Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail is appropriate when the alleged illicit liquor was not in the petitioner's conscious possession.
  • Whether the allegations under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act justify denial of bail.
  • Whether the seizure list, lacking independent witnesses, is sufficient to sustain the charge.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 482(2)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44970 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2026 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Halima Khatoon Wife of Md. Salim Resident of Village - Barharwa, Ward
                 No. - 20, P.S. - Dumra, District - Sitamarhi.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APPS
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending her arrest in connection with Dumra P.S. Case

                   No.247 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 6.3 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was made

                   from a nala which is behind the bathan of petitioner and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44970 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                            2/3




          place from where the recovery was made is an open place

          accessible to general public. It is also submitted that name

          of petitioner transpired only on the basis of suspicion and it

          can be safely said that recovery of illicit liquor was not made

          from conscious possession of this petitioner. It is also

          submitted that the seizure list also appears doubtful being

          not supported by independent witnesses rather than by

          police personnel. Explaining criminal antecedent, Petitioner

          found involved in three more criminal cases.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released

          on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Exclusive Excise
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44970 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Judge- 1, Sitamarhi, in connection with Dumra P.S. Case

                     No.247 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down

                     under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.