Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalu Yadav @ Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Summary

The petitioner, Lalu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a murder case (Sections 103(1) and 238 of the Bihar Negotiable Substances Act) arising from PS Palanwa Case No. 37 of 2025. The deceased's husband, Satish Yadav, had confessed to killing his wife and named the petitioner among those who allegedly helped dispose of the body. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR does not charge him, and that investigation material shows no complicity. The State and the informant opposed the bail. The court examined the material, the confession, and the petitioner's claim of innocence, and applied Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. It granted anticipatory bail on condition of a Rs.10,000 bond and two sureties, subject to the usual conditions of Section 438.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be granted to the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner’s alleged involvement, as per the co‑accused’s confession, warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the material on record establishes a prima facie case against the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • murder
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • confession
  • complicity
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45437 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Lalu Yadav @ Lalu Kumar S/o Sharnbhu Prasad Yadav @ Sambhu Yada
                 Resident of Village-Gad Gahuari, PS.-Palanwa, District-East Champaran,
                 Motihari

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Adv.
                                                  Mr.Dhandev Kumar, Adv.
                                                  Mr.Isha Mishra, Adv.
                 For the State             :      Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 For the Informant         :      Mr.Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Adv.
                                                  Mr.Akshay Tripathi, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   11-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 37 of 2025, registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 238 of BNS.

                                 3. As per allegation, the marriage of the deceased was

                   solemnized with co-accused Satish Yadav ten years prior to

                   lodging of the FIR. Satish Yadav informed the informant, who is

                   mother of the deceased, that he had killed his wife by inflicting

                   blows with bamboo log and soon thereafter, he switched off his

                   mobile set. She came to know that her son-in-law Satish Yadav
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45437 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          and other accused persons had concealed the dead body of the

          deceased.

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated.

          There is no allegation against him in the FIR. Only allegation of

          killing the daughter of the informant is against co-accused

          Satish Yadav, who is husband of the deceased. Satish Yadav

          confessed his guilt and in his confessional statement, he has

          stated that his wife used to talk one Miyaz Alam, to which he

          had prohibited. He confessed that he killed his wife by

          assaulting her with bamboo log. The petitioner and other

          accused persons are named in his confessional statement as

          having assisted him in disposal of the dead body. Learned

          counsel has further submitted that the material collected during

          the course of investigation shows that the petitioner has no

          complicity in commission of murder of the deceased.

                       5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

          and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the

          prayer for bail.

                       6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

          circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or

          surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45437 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

                     10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                     each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                     East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case

                     No. 37 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                     Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

kundan/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.