Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond and surety conditions, as the recovery of liquor was not shown to be from his possession.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, with 8,636.76 litres seized from a truck and two pickups belonging to co‑accused Deep Narayan Singh. The petitioner contended that he neither owned the seized vehicles nor had any conscious possession of the liquor, asserting that the only basis for his inclusion was the testimony of a local chowkidar and that the seizure list lacked independent corroboration. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the petitioner's request for anticipatory bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined the factual submissions and noted that the recovery did not appear to be from the petitioner's physical possession, finding insufficient grounds to deny bail. Consequently, the Court directed that the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, subject to a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC, provided he surrenders within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances.
  • Whether the petitioner had actual possession or control over the seized illicit liquor.
  • Whether the evidence presented is sufficient to justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • possession
  • Section 30
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45545 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2026 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Rahul Kumar Son of Pintu Rai @ Alok Kumar R/O Village - Gopalpur
                 Chaknai, P.S.- Bidupur, District - Vaishali

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Ravish Mishra, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party :         Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-07-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case

                   No.252 of 2026 registered under Section 30(a) Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in

                   illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is

                   recovery of 8636.76 litres of IMFL/country-made liquor.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was made

                   from a truck and two pickup vans which were parked outside
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45545 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
                                            2/3




          brick-klin of the co-accused, namely, Deep Narayan Singh. It

          is also submitted name of petitioner arrayed solely on the

          disclosure made by the local chowkidar. It further submitted

          that the petitioner is neither the owner of any of the seized

          vehicles nor is he in any way connected with the co-accused

          persons and it can be safely said that recovery of illicit liquor

          was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner. It

          is also submitted that the seizure list also appears doubtful

          being not supported by independent witnesses rather than by

          police personnel. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is

          submitted that the petitioner found involved in one criminal

          case, where he is on bail.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory

          bail to the petitioner.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie

          not appears to be made from physical possession of this

          petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a

          period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45545 of 2026(2) dt.10-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

                     Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Court No. 1-

                     cum- district and Additional Sessions Judge, Vaishali at

                     Hajipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.252 of

                     2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

                     482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                      (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.