Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sarvajeet Chaudhary @ Satrajeet Chaudhary @ Ajay Chaudhary @ Sadhu ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Sarvajeet Chaudhary, was charged in a case involving the robbery of a State Bank of India branch and assault of bank staff, alleged under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case is that unknown persons, on gunpoint, looted Rs. 8,29,655 and assaulted employees, with the petitioner’s name being supplied by co‑accused Raja Kumar. The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR, no material was recovered from him, and his implication was solely based on his criminal antecedents and the co‑accused’s statement. The State opposed bail, but the court noted that other co‑accused had been granted bail and that no trial‑in‑process (T.I.P.) had been conducted. After considering the circumstances, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a cash bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to several conditions regarding attendance, cooperation, and non‑tampering with evidence. The order also required the petitioner to report to the police station regularly until the trial concludes.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of robbery and assault under IPC Sections 395, 397 and Arms Act Section 27.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • assault
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication
  • co‑accused

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4556 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2022 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sarvajeet Chaudhary @ Satrajeet Chaudhary @ Ajay Chaudhary @ Sadhu
                 Chaudhary, Son of Late Brahmdeo Chaudhary, R/o Village - Paras Nagar
                 Chautarwa, P.S. - Chautarwa, Dist. - West Champaran.
                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                       Versus

                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bairiya

                   P.S. Case No. 377 of 2022 dated 07.12.2022, giving rise to S. Tr.

                   No. 336 of 2023 instituted for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the

                   Arms Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown

                   persons looted away cash amounting to Rs. 8,29,655/- from the

                   State Bank of India on gunpoint. They also assaulted the informant

                   and other employees of the bank.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4556 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/4




          is not named in the F.I.R. The F.I.R. has been lodged against the

          unknown persons. Co-accused, Raja Kumar disclosed the name of

          the petitioner as one of the associates in the alleged occurrence.

          On that basis, the petitioner has been made accused in this case.

          The said Raja Kumar has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench

          of this Court vide order dated 31.08.2023 passed in Criminal

          Miscellaneous No. 55875 of 2023. It is further submitted that

          nothing has been recovered either from the conscious possession

          of the petitioner or from his house. The petitioner has been made

          accused in this case only on the basis of his criminal antecedents.

          Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that other similarly

          situated co-accused have been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench

          of this Court vide Annexure-3 series. It is further submitted that no

          T.I.P. has been conducted as yet. Lastly, it has been submitted that

          the petitioner is in custody since 19.01.2023 having fourteen

          criminal cases against him in which the petitioner is on bail.

          Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

                        5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the

          petitioner.

                        6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

          case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the

          petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4556 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            3/4




          to the satisfaction of the learned Xth District and Additional

          Sessions Judge, Bettiah, West Champaran in Bairiya P.S. Case No.

          377 of 2022 giving rise to S.Tr. No. 336 of 2023, subject to the

          following conditions:-

                          1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall

                          be properly represented on each and every date

                          fixed by the Court and on his absence on two

                          consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail

                          bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                          2. One of the bailors will be his own blood relation,

                          preferably father, mother, brother, sister and or his

                          wife.

                          3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he

                          will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

                          made accused in any other case of similar nature

                          after his release in the present case and thereafter

                          the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

                          proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

                          misuse.

                          4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at

                          liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4556 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                       4/4




                                     5. The petitioner within two weeks after his release

                                     from custody shall appear before the local police

                                     station along with a copy of this order and thereafter

                                     shall appear in the first week of every month to mark

                                     his attendance till the conclusion of trial.


                                                                  (Khatim Reza, J)

premchand/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.