Patna High Court

Khushi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 30 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

Holding

No modification is required in the present case.

Summary

The petitioner, Khushi Kumari, filed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking modification of the order dated 21 May 2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33493 of 2025. The respondents were the State of Bihar and the Vigilance Department of the Government of Bihar. The petition was argued before Hon’ble Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma by senior counsel Amit Shrivastava for the petitioner and by counsel Anil Singh for the Vigilance Department, with the State represented by APP Pramod Kumar Pandey. The Court examined whether any grounds existed to alter the earlier order. Finding no justification for alteration, the Court held that no modification was required. Consequently, the application for modification was dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether the order dated 21‑05‑2025 in Cr. Misc. No. 33493 of 2025 should be modified

Subjects

modification of order
criminal miscellaneous petition
high court
application dismissed

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45901 of 2025
                                                 In
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33493 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2024 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas
                    ======================================================
                    Khushi Kumari S/o Sri Sunil Kumar Resident of E-94, P.C.- Colony, PS-
                    Kankarbagh, Patna
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
               1.    The State of Bihar
               2.    Additional Chief Secretary, The Vigilance Dept. Govt. of Bihar The
                     Vigilance Dept., Govt. of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                    ======================================================
                    Appearance :
                    For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate
                                                     Mr. Apurv Harsh, Advocates
                    For the Vigilance        :       Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate
                    For the State             :      Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
                    ======================================================
                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                          ORAL ORDER

8     30-01-2026                        Heard Mr. Amit Shrivastava, learned Senior counsel
                      for the petitioner, Mr. Anil Singh, learned counsel for the
                      Vigilance and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the
                      State.
                                    2. The present petition has been filed for modifying
                      the order dated 21.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33493 of
                      2025.
                                    3. No modification is required in the present case.
                                    4. Accordingly, this modification application stands
                      dismissed.



                                                                    (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U          T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…