Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Chaudhary @ Pawan ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Pawan Kumar Chaudhary was arrested in connection with the alleged murder of his wife, who the prosecution claims was killed on 22 July 2024 after suffering dowry‑related cruelty. The petitioner contends that the allegations are false and that his wife actually committed suicide by hanging. He has been in custody since 20 January 2025 and the charge under sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita was framed on 8 April 2026. The petitioner applied for regular bail, denying any involvement in the crime. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the accusation. The Court, considering the nature of the accusation and the length of custody, allowed the petition for regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. Consequently, the petitioner was released on bail pending trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged murder and dowry‑related cruelty.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • dowry harassment
  • murder
  • suicide
  • Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45919 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2024 Thana- AGIAON BAZAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Chaudhary @ Pawan Chaudhary S/O
                 Phulendra Chaudhary R/O VILLAGE- CHAKTOLA, P.S.- AGIAON
                 BAZAR, DISTT-BHOJPUR

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Amarendra Kumar , Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   13-05-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for

                   the offence punishable under sections                  80(2), 3(5) of the

                   Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita .

                                3 . As per prosecution case, sister of informant was

                   married with this petitioner, namely, Pawan Choudhary in the

                   year 2023 and it is alleged that after the marriage, she was

                   subjected to cruelty and harassment for dowry and lastly, on

                   22.07.2024 at about 2 PM, it is alleged that all accused persons

                   committed her murder.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while

                   denying the allegation, submits that the petitioner has falsely

                   been implicated in this case because petitioner is husband of the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45919 of 2025(5) dt.13-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      deceased. Allegation is general and omnibus against him. He

                      never committed any torture or harassment with the deceased.

                      As a matter of fact, deceased herself committed suicide by

                      hanging. Petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025 . Charge has

                      already been framed on 08.04.2026 .

                                   5 . Learned counsel for the State and informant

                      oppose the prayer for bail.

                                   6. Considering the nature of accusation and period of

                      custody of the petitioner, his prayer for regular bail is allowed.

                      Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on

                      furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      C.J.M., Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Agiaon Bazar P.S. Case

                      No. 109 of 2024 .



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.