Patna High Court
FAKIRA RAYversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
Permission to withdraw the application was granted and the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Fakira Ray, filed an application in the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous proceeding. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, requested that the court allow the withdrawal, stating the application had become infructuous. The State, represented by an Assistant Public Prosecutor, and the second opposite party, represented by Mr. Amaresh Kumar, were heard on the matter. Justice Soni Shrivastava granted the petitioner's request, permitting the withdrawal of the application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be granted permission to withdraw the pending application.
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- procedural law
- criminal miscellaneous
- high court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47561 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2025 Thana- SHAHPUR PATORI District- Samastipur
======================================================
Fakira Ray S/O Late Yogi Ray @ Moti Ray Resident Of Village-Uttari
Dhamaun, P.S.-Patori, District-Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Nirmala Devi W/O Binod Ray Resident Of Village-Uttari Dhamaun, P.S.-
Patori, District-Samastipur
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
5 26-02-2026 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner, Mr. Nazire Ansari, learned APP for the State and Mr.
Amaresh Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
2. Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application as the
same has became infructuous.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
withdrawn as the same has became infructuous.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U T
Checking your session…