Patna High Court

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 17 February 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SONI SHRIVASTAVA

Holding

The application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed an application seeking withdrawal so that the case could be taken up for framing of charge. The court heard arguments from counsel for both sides. The petitioner’s request to withdraw the application was granted. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the court again after charge framing.

Subjects

withdrawal of application
criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47834 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-706 Year-2024 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna
                  ======================================================
                  Rahul Kumar S/o Late Ambika Ray R/o Village- Nawratanpur, P.S.-
                  Kankarbagh, District- Patna
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                  The State of Bihar
                                                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Satrudhan Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Bharat Bhushan
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

6    17-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                    learned APP for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present application in

                    order to approach this Court upon framing of charge.

                                 3. Prayer is allowed.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.


                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
devendra/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…