Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner upon furnishing the prescribed bail bond and sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Ray, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault, robbery and possession of a firearm, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused opened fire on an informant and his cousin, causing injuries and stealing a golden chain. The petitioner contended that the FIR’s allegation of a gunshot was unsupported, that the injuries were simple and later classified as grievous without specifying the weapon, and that the dispute was a familial land conflict. After hearing both sides, the court considered the seriousness of the offences, the petitioner’s custody since April 2025, and the fact that a co‑accused had already been granted bail. The court ordered the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and directed his release on bail, subject to cooperation with the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the grave nature of the offences alleged under the B.N.S. and the Arms Act.

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 27
  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115, 126, 190, 191, 303, 351, 352

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • B.N.S. sections
  • Arms Act
  • grievous injury
  • land dispute
  • bail bond

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47936 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2024 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Ray Son of Ganesh Ray Resident of Saidpur PS- Mansi District-
                 Khagaria                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar                             ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-01-2026                    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

                   of regular bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 290 of

                   2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190,

                   191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of

                   B.N.S. and 27 of Arms Act.

                                3. The prosecution alleges that while the informant and

                   his cousin were ploughing, the petitioner and other accused

                   persons, carrying a rifle and an iron rod, confronted them. The

                   informant and his cousin were injured, and others who came to

                   assist were also affected. It is further alleged that the accused took

                   the informant’s golden chain and threatened him.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the specific allegation against the petitioner is of opening fire,

                   which allegedly hit the head of the informant, but the injuries were

                   simple in nature, caused by hard and blunt substance, which does
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47936 of 2025(3) dt.20-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     not corroborate the allegation made in the FIR. He has also

                     submitted that after five months, the nature of the injuries was re-

                     examined by the Medical Board, which found them to be grievous,

                     without specifying the nature of the weapon whereby the injuries

                     were caused. Both the parties are agnates and there is land dispute

                     between them. The petitioner has been in custody since

                     26.04.2025. Co-accused Chhotu Rai has been granted bail.

                                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                     opposed the prayer for bail.

                                  6.   Considering        the    above-mentioned   facts   and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to

                     furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the

                     petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with

                     two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                     J.M.-Ist Class, Khagaria/Concerned Court in connection with

                     Mansi P.S. Case No. 290 of 2024, subject to the following

                     conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of

                     trial and make himself available as and when required by the

                     court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.