Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gulshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court declined to grant bail and directed the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the Juvenile Justice Board.

Summary

Gulshan Kumar, a juvenile, was charged with rape of a minor and related offences under IPC sections 376, 323, 504, 506/34 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He had earlier applied for bail, which the Patna High Court rejected, directing an expedited trial. He filed a second bail application. The Court noted the seriousness of the allegations and the fact that the accused is a juvenile, and therefore did not grant bail. Instead, the Court disposed of the application, allowing the petitioner to approach the Juvenile Justice Board for an appropriate relief. The trial was directed to be expedited.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to a juvenile accused of rape and related offences under the IPC and POCSO Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • juvenile
  • rape
  • POCSO
  • IPC
  • Juvenile Justice Board
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48246 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2023 Thana- ALAMNAGAR District- Madhepura
                 ======================================================
                 Gulshan Kumar S/o- Pappu Mandal Village- Gangapur Thebhai Tola, Ps-
                 Alamnagar Ratwara OP, Dist-Madhepura

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Subhash Mandal S/o- Late Buchay Mandal Village- Gangapur Noniyachak
                 Tola Ps- Ratwara Op Dist- Madhepura

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Ranjay Kumar Singh
                 For the State           :       Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   10-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Alamnagar

                   (Ratwara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 211 of 2023 registered for the

                   offence under Section 376, 323, 504,506/34 of the IPC and

                   Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

                                 3. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner has

                   been rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.03.2024 passed

                   in Cr. Misc. No. 79899 of 2023, which reads as under:

                                               “Heard       learned      counsel       for    the
                                    petitioner and learned APP for the State.
                                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48246 of 2025(3) dt.10-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                                       with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 211 of 2023
                                       registered for the offence under Section 376, 323,
                                       504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under
                                       Section 4 of the POCSO Act.
                                                    3. As per the prosecution case, the
                                       petitioner is accused of committing rape over a
                                       minor girl.
                                                    4. Considering the serious allegations
                                       levelled against the petitioner of committing rape
                                       over a minor girl, this Court is not inclined to
                                       grant bail to the petitioner.
                                                    5.    Accordingly,      this   application   is
                                       dismissed.
                                                    6. The Court below is directed to
                                       expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the
                                       same at the earliest.”

                                    4. The petitioner has been held to be a juvenile.

                                    5. In these circumstances, this application is disposed

                       of with a liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate

                       application before the Juvenile Justice Board.



                                                  (Sandeep Kumar, J)
priyanka/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.