Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash Sah @ Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail cannot be granted as the accused are implicated in the kidnapping of a minor who remains missing, and thus the bail applications are rejected.

Summary

The petitioners, Suman Kumar and Vikash Sah, applied for regular bail in a case where a 12‑year‑old girl was alleged to have been kidnapped by four accused, including the petitioners, as per FIRs under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 34 and POCSO Act sections 8 and 12. The prosecution contended that the minor remains missing and the petitioners were actively involved in the kidnapping, while the petitioners claimed false implication, no prior criminal record, and willingness to cooperate. The State opposed bail, citing a counter‑affidavit detailing police investigations and the seriousness of the offence. After hearing both sides, the court found the allegations serious and the minor still unrecovered, and therefore refused to grant regular bail. The court also ordered the petitioners, who had earlier been released on provisional bail, to surrender within three weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted to accused persons in a kidnapping case involving a minor under IPC and POCSO provisions.
  • Whether the petitioners' claim of false implication and lack of criminal antecedent outweighs the seriousness of the offence and risk of non‑appearance.
  • Whether the earlier provisional bail can be continued in view of the pending investigation.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • POCSO
  • regular bail
  • provisional bail
  • IPC
  • missing person
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19705 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2024 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Suman Kumar S/o- Aadhar Paswan Village- Gaira PS- Kotwa Dist- East
                  Champaran
                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Chunchun Devi W/o- Rajdeo Paswan Village- Barharwa Kala Ramji Tola
                   Ps- Kotwa Dist- East Champaran
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                                                          with
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 48580 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2024 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Vikash Sah @ Vikash Kumar S/O Khedan Sah @ Jagranath Sah R/O Village-
                  Heman Chhapra, P.S- Kotwa, Distt.- West Champaran.
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar
            2.     Chunchun Devi D/O Rajeshwar Paswan R/O Village- Barharwa Ramjee
                   Tola, P.S- Kotwa, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari.
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 19705 of 2025)
                  For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Hemant Ray, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP
                  (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 48580 of 2025)
                  For the Petitioner/s     : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                        ORAL ORDER

15   01-04-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                  2. The petitioners have preferred this application for

                    grant of regular bail in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case no. 42

                    of 2024 registered under sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the

                    Indian Penal Code and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19705 of 2025(15) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/3




          that her 12 years old daughter was kidnapped by four named

          accused persons including the two petitioners herein who had

          come on two motorcycles. The informant further that she

          apprehends that the kidnapping has taken place with some bad

          motive.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner Suman Kumar

          submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the

          case. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. As per the

          information received, the daughter of the informant has got

          married elsewhere but the police personnel are not taking

          adequate steps for her recovery. It was on these grounds that the

          Superintendent of Police on earlier occasion had been directed

          to appear in the Court and the petitioner had been enlarged on

          provisional bail vide order dated 26.1.2026. The petitioner is in

          custody since 6.8.2024 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

          The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner Vikash Sah

          submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely

          implicated in the case. The allegation against him at best is of

          having assisted. This is absolutely false and categorically

          denied. The petitioner is in custody since 23.3.2025 and has no

          criminal antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19705 of 2025(15) dt.01-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      investigation/ trial.

                                   6. The application for bail is opposed by         learned

                      A.P.P. for the State who submits that pursuant to the direction of

                      this Court, a counter affidavit has been filed in the case on

                      19.3.2026 wherein steps taken by the police authorities

                      including the constitution of special investigation team etc. have

                      all been stated in detail.           It is further stated that both the

                      petitioners are named in the FIR and have actively participated

                      in the kidnapping/disappearance of the minor daughter of the

                      informant.

                                   7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking

                      into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R.

                      of being among the four accused persons on two motorcycles who

                      kidnapped the 12 year old minor daughter of the informant who is

                      still missing and has not been recovered, the Court is not inclined to

                      enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application for bail of both the

                      petitioners are rejected.

                                   8. Both the petitioners who were earlier enlarged on

                      provisional bail are directed to surrender in the learned Court below

                      within a period of 3 weeks.


Bibhash/-                                                       (Partha Sarthy, J)
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.