Patna High Court
RAMAN KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Raman Kumar Singh, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case concerning a Section 302 IPC charge. During the hearing on 8 January 2026, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, requested that the application be withdrawn. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application as withdrawn. However, the court noted that the serious charge of murder under Section 302 IPC remains and directed the trial court to expedite the trial. No substantive merits of the underlying criminal case were addressed in this order.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s application can be withdrawn at the hearing
- Procedural consequences of withdrawing the application in a criminal case involving Section 302 IPC
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 302
Subjects
- Criminal Procedure
- Withdrawal of Application
- Section 302 IPC
- Trial Expediting
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48585 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran
======================================================
Raman Kumar Singh S/O Late Ramanuj Singh R/O Village/ Mohalla- Mauna
Misr Toli, Purbi Korar Ps. Town Thana, Dist. Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sukhal Mahto S/O Late Satan Mahto R/O Village- Bichla Telpa, Ps. Town
Ps. Dist. Saran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhil Kr. Agrawal, Advocate
Mr. Bhanu Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Bhanu Prakash, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 08-01-2026 After some arguments, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal,
learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the
present application.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. However, since Section 302 of Indian Penal Code
has also been added in the present case, learned Court
concerned is directed to expedite the trial.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U T
Checking your session…