Patna High Court
Ajit Kumar @ Ajit PaswanversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Anticipatory bail was denied because the petitioner failed to prosecute the application.
Summary
Ajit Kumar filed an anticipatory bail petition under the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner did not appear before the court for two consecutive dates, and the State counsel was the only party present. The court observed that the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the bail application. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal means the petitioner will remain in custody pending trial.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate decision when a petitioner seeking anticipatory bail fails to appear before the court and shows lack of interest in pursuing the application?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- non-prosecution
- Criminal Procedure Code
- bail petition
- court procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48983 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-32 Year-2025 Thana- TANDWA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Ajit Kumar @ Ajit Paswan S/o Lakhan Paswan R/o vill - Shivpur, Kojhi, P.S.-
Amba, Distt.- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : NONE
For the Opposite Party : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4 22-09-2025 Nobody appears for the petitioner for the second
consecutive date. However, State counsel is present.
2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in
pursing this petition seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3. This bail petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
Checking your session…