Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamlawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that bail could not be granted as the petitioner’s alleged involvement in a dowry‑related murder warranted detention.

Summary

Kamlawati Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, was named in an FIR for alleged involvement in the murder of the informant’s daughter over a dowry dispute, charged under sections 103(i) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. She applied for bail, asserting innocence, a clean antecedent, and that she was not present at the scene. The State opposed bail, contending that all accused, including the petitioner, participated in the killing. The Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences and the petitioner’s alleged role as a mother‑in‑law. Finding the allegations credible and the offences grave, the Court declined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under sections 103(i) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in a dowry‑related murder case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • murder
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • criminal procedure
  • false allegations

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4965 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2025 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Kamlawati Devi Wife of Daroga sah Resident of Village - Soniya, PS.-
                 Daudpur, District - Saran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Gajendra Nath Ojha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection

                   with Daudpur P.S. Case No. 147/2025 lodged on 13.06.2025, for

                   the offences punishable under sections 103(i) and 3(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. . As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged

                   against three named accused persons, including the petitioner,

                   alleging therein that all the accused, in connivance with each

                   other, killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment

                   of dowry demand.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence; however,

                   due to false and frivolous allegations, the present FIR has been
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4965 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      lodged. It is further submitted that the petitioner, being the

                      mother-in-law of the deceased, has no concern whatsoever with

                      the alleged occurrence. In fact, she was not present at the place

                      of occurrence on the alleged date, as she had gone to her maika.

                      Moreover, the deceased was residing separately with her

                      younger son. The petitioner has a clean antecedent.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the

                      prayer for bail and submits that all the accused persons,

                      including the petitioner, being the mother-in-law of the

                      deceased, have committed the murder of the informant’s

                      daughter on account of non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

                                   6. In this background, this Court is not inclined to

                      grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of

                      the petitioner in connection with the aforementioned case,

                      pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra is

                      hereby rejected.



                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.