Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pappu Kumar @ Prabhu Shankar PalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and comply with attendance conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Pappu Kumar, sought bail in a case (Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025) alleging robbery under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants looted Rs. 45,320 from an informant at gunpoint. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating his name did not appear in the FIR and was only mentioned in a co‑accused’s confessional statement; CCTV footage showed only other individuals. He also asserted that no material was recovered from him and that he was being framed due to his prior criminal record. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the court considered the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and his willingness to cooperate, and ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of attendance and cooperation.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. given the nature of the allegations and the evidentiary material.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • antecedent
  • CCTV evidence
  • Section 309(4) B.N.S.

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4989 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2025 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Pappu Kumar @ Prabhu Shankar Pal, Son of Sandeep Kumar Pal, Resident of
                 Village – Bhagwani, Ward No.- 01, P.S.- Ghaildh, District - Madhepura.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Nauhatta P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown

                   miscreants have looted away altogether Rs. 45,320/- from the

                   informant on gun point and fled away.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The name of

                   this petitioner is not there in the F.I.R. His name has surfaced

                   during investigation in the confessional statement of one co-

                   accused Bhushan Kumar. It has further been submitted that the

                   C.C.T.V. footage installed at the shop shows only the face of
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4989 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       Bhushan Kumar, Bhavesh Kumar and Akhilesh Kumar. It has also

                       been submitted that this petitioner has also given his confessional

                       statement. Nothing has been recovered form his possession. He

                       has been framed in this case due to his antecedent. He is having

                       criminal antecedent of 10 cases. Save and except the confessional

                       statement, there is nothing against him. He is languishing in

                       judicial custody since 14.08.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                       of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                       Magistrate 1st Class, Saharsa in connection with Nauhatta P.S.

                       Case No. 131 of 2025 with the condition that petitioner shall

                       cooperate in trail and mark his attendance weekly at Supaul

                       P.S.


                                                     (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.