Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shriram YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their anticipatory bail application and dismissed the bail petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners, Shriram Yadav and Lakshman Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with PS Raghunathpur Case No. 62 of 2001 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. Both petitioners are elderly and have no prior criminal record, and the case has been pending for a long time. During the hearing, the petitioners sought permission to withdraw their bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted the request and dismissed the bail application as withdrawn. The Court directed the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within four weeks, after which the trial court must decide their surrender‑cum‑bail application on its merits without prejudice to the withdrawal.

Issues considered

  • What is the procedure for withdrawing an anticipatory bail application?
  • Whether the trial court should entertain a surrender‑cum‑bail application after the anticipatory bail has been withdrawn.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of bail application
  • surrender
  • criminal procedure
  • elderly accused

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5062 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2001 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan
                 ======================================================
           1.     Shriram Yadav S/o- Dudhnath Yadav Resident Of Village- Kausar, Po-
                  Gabhirar, Ps -Raghunathpur, DIst- Siwan
           2.    Lakshman Yadav S/o- Dudhnath Yadav Resident Of Village- Kausar, Po-
                 Gabhirar, Ps -Raghunathpur, DIst- Siwan

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. After some argument, learned counsel for the

                   petitioners seek permission to withdraw this bail application.

                                3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

                                4. As such, the present bail application stands

                   dismissed as withdrawn with regard to the present petitioners in

                   connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2001,

                   pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan.

                                5. It transpires to this Court that the petitioners are old

                   aged persons, having no criminal antecedent and the case is

                   pending since long against them, therefore, this Court hereby
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5062 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                         2/2




                       directs the petitioners to surrender before the concerned trial

                       court within four weeks. And if the petitioners surrender before

                       the concerned trial court within a period of 4 weeks, then in that

                       case, the Trial Court is directed to pass order on their surrender-

                       cum-bail application on the same day considering every aspect

                       of the matter, without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail

                       application of the petitioners has been withdrawn and the Trial

                       Court shall pass order on the merit of this case.



                                                                     (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.