Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhagat ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Bhagat Choudhary, a Nepalese resident, was arrested for alleged possession of 15 grams of brown sugar, a contravention of sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the seizure was not conducted in accordance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act or Section 105 of the B.N.S.S, that there were no independent witnesses to the seizure, and that the quantity, while above the small‑quantity threshold, was far below commercial quantity. He also highlighted his clean criminal record and the fact that he had been in judicial custody since 7 September 2025. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found the procedural lapses and the modest quantity sufficient to grant regular bail, directing the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the NDPS Act for possession of 15 grams of brown sugar.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act and Section 105 of the B.N.S.S in the seizure process warrants bail.
  • Whether the quantity involved, being more than a small quantity but less than a commercial quantity, justifies bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior criminal antecedent and the period of pre‑trial detention affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • seizure procedure
  • quantity of narcotic
  • criminal antecedent
  • pre‑trial detention
  • Nepalese national

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5073 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2025 Thana- Basmatia District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Bhagat Choudhary Son of Tej Narayan Choudhary Resident of Village-
                 Bharol, Ward No. 6, P.S.- Chakraghati, District- Sunsari (Nepal)

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   04-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 8(c)/21(b)

                   of the NDPS Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that from the pocket

                   of this petitioner, altogether 15 grams of brown sugar was

                   recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no

                   independent witness of the seizure list rather they are police

                   personnel. Police has not complied either Section 50 of the

                   NDPS Act or Section 105 of B.N.S.S while preparing seizure. It
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5073 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      has further been submitted that the contraband which is alleged

                      to have been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is

                      though more than small quantity but is much less than

                      commercial quantity as per NDPS Act. A statement has been

                      made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no

                      criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial

                      custody since 07.09.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Basmatiya P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum the

                      Special Judge, NDPS Act, Araria.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.