Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chhotu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Summary

The petitioner, Chhotu Kumar, was implicated in a case alleging assault, outrage of modesty, robbery and other offences under various sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. He claimed the allegations were false, arising from a property dispute with the informant, who is his sister-in-law. The prosecution admitted that the injuries were simple in nature. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing innocence and lack of serious injury. The State opposed bail but also acknowledged the injuries were simple. The court, after considering the facts, granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. given the nature of the alleged offences and the simple injuries.
  • Whether the allegations constitute false implication arising from a property dispute.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 Cr.P.C.
  • false implication
  • property dispute
  • assault
  • robbery
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51204 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- SANOKHAR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Kumar S/O Arjun Sah Resident of Village-Badi Naki,P.S.-Sanokhar,
                 District- Bhagalpur.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra
                                                 Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Gupta
                                                 Ms.Isha Mishra
                 For the State            :      Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   11-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

                   learned APP for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with

                   Sanokhar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024, registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(3),

                   3/5 of BNS.

                                  3. Prosecution case in short is that on 31.08.2024 at about

                   2:00 P.M., the petitioner and co-accused Arjun Sah came to the house

                   of the informant. Thereafter, the petitioner attempted to outrage her

                   modesty, assaulted her, snatched her silver necklace, and threatened

                   her. Thereafter, while the informant was going to the hospital with

                   her father, the accused persons including the petitioner intercepted

                   them and snatched Rs. 6,000/- at gunpoint, after assaulting her.

                                  4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51204 of 2025(4) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The

                     petitioner and husband of the informant are own brothers. There is

                     property dispute between them and that is why the petitioner and his

                     family members have falsely been implicated. The informant has

                     implicated even her father-in-law in the present case as co-accused.

                     She was demanding her share in the property and the demand was

                     not acceptable to father-in-law. She has submitted further that the

                     injuries are simple in nature.

                                  5. On the other hand, Mr. J.N. Thakur, the learned APP for

                     the State though opposed the prayer for bail but fairly admitted that

                     the injuries are simple in nature.

                                  6.    Considering       the    above-mentioned   facts   and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or

                     surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be

                     released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bhagalpur in

                     connection with Sanokhar P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024, subject to the

                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

kundan/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.