Patna High Court
Dilo Yadav @ Dil KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The application for regular bail was rejected.
Summary
The petitioner, Dilo Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Larjhaghat Case No. 37 of 2024) under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He alleged that he is innocent and sought regular bail, having been in custody since 19 March 2025. The State opposed the bail, contending that the petitioner, as the husband of the deceased, was involved in the killing along with co‑accused. The Court examined the submissions and the case records, and, considering the seriousness of the allegations, decided not to grant bail. Consequently, the petition for regular bail was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in view of the allegations of murder.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 238, 3(5), 80(2)
Subjects
- regular bail
- murder
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- bail denial
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51277 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- LARJHAGHAT District- Samastipur
======================================================
Dilo Yadav @ Dil Kumar S/o Rajiv Yadav R/o Village- Fuhia, P.S.-
Larjhaghat, District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Basant Kumar Tripathy
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
6 24-03-2026 Seen the office notes.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
3. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Larjhaghat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024 registered for the offence
under Sections 80(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.
4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner, who is
the husband of the deceased, is alleged to have killed the
deceased along with other co-accused persons.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.
Petitioner is in custody since 19.03.2025.
5. The learned counsel for the State vehemently
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51277 of 2025(6) dt.24-03-2026
2/2
opposes the bail application.
6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and
have gone through the records of the case. Considering the
allegation levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not
inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands
rejected.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…