Patna High Court
VINAY SHARMAversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
- Bench
- SONI SHRIVASTAVA
Holding
The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Vinay Sharma, filed an application in the Patna High Court but failed to appear for hearings despite repeated notices on 02-02-2026, 08-12-2025, and 29-01-2026. The State's counsel, Ashok Kumar Singh, was present throughout. The court observed that the petitioner had apparently lost interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the application on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined.
Subjects
- non-prosecution
- procedural default
- court procedure
- application dismissal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52076 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2022 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna
======================================================
VINAY SHARMA SON OF LATE SURESH CHANDRA SINGH
RESIDENT OF PLOT NO. B/528, SONALIKA CO-OPERATIVE COLONY,
PAIJABA, (RANIPUR), P.O.- JHAUGANJ, P.S.- BYE PASS, DISTRICT-
PATNA. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. KUMARI VIMLA WIFE OF VINAY SHARMA RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.
B/528, SONALIKA CO-OPERATIVE COLONY, PAIJABA, (RANIPUR),
P.O.- JHAUGANJ, P.S.- BYE PASS, DISTRICT- PATNA
3. VIBHAY PRAKASH SON OF VINAY SHARMA RESIDENT OF PLOT
NO. B/528, SONALIKA CO-OPERATIVE COLONY, PAIJABA,
(RANIPUR), P.O.- JHAUGANJ, P.S.- BYE PASS, DISTRICT- PATNA
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
4 02-02-2026 In spite of repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of
the petitioner. On 08.12.2025 and 29.01.2026 also none had
appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned APP for the State is present before the
Court.
3. It appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in
the case.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Soni Shrivastava, J)
Trivedi/-
U T
Checking your session…