Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ali Azam MianversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to strict conditions, including surety bonds, verification of antecedent, and regular police station attendance.

Summary

The petitioner, Ali Azam, sought bail in a case registered under sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(b), 23(b) of the NDPS Act and section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act, 2023, after being in custody since 23 February 2025 for possession of 5.3 kg of ganja and having one prior criminal antecedent. The earlier bail application was rejected on 18 June 2025. The High Court considered the length of custody, delay in trial, and the nature of the antecedent, and allowed bail on 12 February 2026. Bail was conditioned on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties who must be close relatives, verification of criminal antecedent, and mandatory weekly attendance at the police station. The order also stipulated cancellation of bail for any default in appearance.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the seriousness of the NDPS offences and his prior criminal antecedent
  • Whether the delay in trial and period of custody justify the grant of bail
  • What conditions, if any, should be imposed on the bail to ensure compliance

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • criminal antecedent
  • trial delay
  • surety
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5260 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2025 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ali Azam Mian S/o Imteyaj Mian Resident of - Dhumtand Jasauli, P.S -
                 Bhangaha, District - West Champaran
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey
                 For the State            :        Mr.Raj Kishor Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the

                   petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Sathi P.S. Case

                   No.50 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under

                   sections 8/20(b)(ii)(b), 23(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act and under

                   section 317(5) of the B.N.S. 2023.

                                 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has

                   been rejected vide order dated 18.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

                   No. 37943 of 2025.

                                 4. There is recovery of 5.3 Kg. of ganja from the

                   petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2025 and has

                   one criminal antecedent.

                                 5. Considering the period of custody and the fact that

                   there is delay in the trial, this application is allowed.

                                 6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5260 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Exclusive Special Judge (NDPS), Bettiah, West Champaran/

                     concerned Court in connection with Sathi P.S. Case No. 50 of

                     2025, subject to the condition that both the bails should be the

                     close relative of the petitioner.

                                   7. At the time of accepting bail bonds of the

                     petitioner, the Court below will verify the criminal antecedent of

                     the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner has criminal

                     antecedent under NDPS Act, the Court below shall not accept

                     the bail bonds of the petitioner and if it is found that the

                     petitioner has only one criminal antecedent i.e., Bhangaha P.S.

                     Case No. 103 of 2024, his bail bonds shall be accepted by the

                     Court below.

                                   8. The petitioner will also mark attendance in

                     Bhangha Police Station, District-West Champaran on every

                     Sunday of the month. Any default in appearance at the Police

                     Station would result in cancellation of bail bonds of the

                     petitioner.


                                                                  (Sandeep Kumar, J)
P. Kumar
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.