Patna High Court
Arvind Ray @ Arvind Prasad Yadav @ Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the application, and therefore the application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Arvind Ray, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail. He argued that a separate application (Criminal Miscellaneous No. 91 of 2025) had already been granted a stay on 21 January 2026. The opposite party contended that other accused whose anticipatory bail applications were rejected should not influence the petitioner’s relief. The petitioner then requested permission to withdraw the present application. The court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw, and consequently dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending criminal miscellaneous application seeking anticipatory bail.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal miscellaneous application
- withdrawal of application
- stay order
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52888 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-572 Year-2024 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District-
Vaishali
======================================================
Arvind Ray @ Arvind Prasad Yadav @ Pappu Rai S/o Upendra Ray Resident
Of Village- Jadhua, PS- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Binay Kumar S/o Late Suraj Deo Singh R/o Vill. and Post- Nikhatikalan,
PS- Raghunathpur, Distt.- Siwan, presently working as Security Manager,
Singla Construction Pvt Limited, having its office at S.P. Singla
Construction Pvt Limited, 5th Floor, Flat No.- 502, Kanaj Baraj Complex,
Boaring Road, PS- Srikrishnapuri, Distt.- Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Prabhat, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP
For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Sanjeeb Kumar Sanju, Advocate
Mr. Bhaskar Sandilya, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
6 11-03-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,
learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel
appearing for the Opposite Party No. 2.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that another Criminal Miscellaneous application bearing
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 91 of 2025 (Arvind Ray vs. The
State of Bihar) has been filed by the present petitioner, in which
stay has been granted vide order dated 21.01.2026.
3. Learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 2, on the
other hand, submits that the other accused persons had moved
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52888 of 2025(6) dt.11-03-2026
2/2
before this Hon’ble Court for anticipatory bail and their prayer
for anticipatory bail was rejected vide order dated 21.01.2026
passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 50663 of 2025 (Avadesh
Ray @ Awadhesh Rai) and vide order dated 24.06.2025 passed
in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43719 of 2025 (Bipat Rai @
Vipat Ray). Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the
petitioner be rejected.
4. However, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the present Criminal Miscellaneous
application.
5. Permission is granted.
6. Accordingly, the present Criminal Miscellaneous
application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-
U T
Checking your session…