Patna High Court
Krishan Kumar @ Krishna KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was not granted; the application was dismissed.
Summary
Krishan Kumar was arrested on 21 July 2025 in connection with a FIR lodged by the deceased’s wife, alleging that the petitioner was hired to conspire and cause her death. The investigation revealed that the informant had engaged the petitioner’s services and plotted the murder. The petitioner applied for bail before the Patna High Court under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023. The court examined the seriousness of the alleged conspiracy, the nature of the offence and the risk of evidence tampering. Finding the allegations grave, the court declined to grant bail and dismissed the application.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023 given the alleged conspiracy and murder.
Legislation cited
- BNS, 2023 — s. 103(1)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- high court
- Bihar
- Section 103(1)
- conspiracy
- murder
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.534 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-805 Year-2025 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
======================================================
Krishan Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Son of Late Kamo Sharma Resident of
Village - Dhakjari Ward No. 12, P.S. - Sonbarsa Kachahary, District - Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarnath Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 24-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 805 of 2025 registered for the
offence under Section 103(1) of the BNS, 2023.
3. The petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2025.
4. The informant is the wife of the deceased and she
had lodged the FIR against unknown criminals and subsequently
during investigation, it has come that the informant had engaged
the service of the petitioner and after hatching conspiracy had
got killed her.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not
inclined to grant bail tot he petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…